Cambridge city leader adds name to Labour letter to Theresa May after leaked Tory text messages
PUBLISHED: 08:52 09 February 2017 | UPDATED: 08:56 09 February 2017
Iliffe Media Ltd
Alleged ‘sweetheart funding deal’ for Conservative-run Surrey County Council prompts Labour outrage.
Leader of Labour-run Cambridge City Council, Lewis Herbert, signed a letter yesterday evening alongside Labour leaders from across the country to Prime Minister Theresa May to dispute a Government ‘sweetheart funding deal’ for Surrey County Council, and possibly other Tory counties too.
The letter reads: “We have a crisis in social care, resulting from the Conservative Government’s cuts to local authority funding. Secret backroom deals are not the answer. We urgently need a proper solution, which means providing councils with the funding they needed to solve this crisis.”
Leader of Surrey County Council, David Hodge, is thought to have sent text messages, supposedly intended for Nick King, Sajid Javid’s special advisor, to the Labour leader on the Local Government Association instead. The texts allegedly revealed the Conservative council are getting extra social care funding by bank transfer, reverving decisions to hold a referendum to up council tax by 15 per cent.
The letter, signed by Labour leaders across the country, reads:
The Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London SW1A 2AA
We are writing regarding funding arrangements for Conservative-run Surrey County Council. Specifically, the alleged reason behind David Hodge’s decision to drop a planned referendum on increasing council tax by 15 per cent to cover the severe shortfalls in social care, after apparently holding ‘several conversations’ with Whitehall figures.
It has been widely reported in leaked texts, sent by David Hodge supposedly intended for Nick King, Sajid Javid’s special advisor, that DCLG was working on a ‘Memorandum of Understanding.’
In response, as Leaders of Labour councils and council groups, we have a series of questions:
a) Was a deal struck for Surrey County Council?
b) If so, what are the details of the deal?
c) Why was a special deal struck with Surrey behind closed doors?
d) Does the Government finally recognise that local Government is grossly underfunded and is that why they have given a special deal to Surrey?
e) Does the Government now recognise that there will be a £2.6bn shortfall in social care funding by 2020?
f) If a deal was struck, will Ministers offer the same deal given to Surrey to all councils, regardless of political affiliation, when the Local Government finance settlement is published on 22nd February?
We have a crisis in social care, resulting from the Conservative Government’s cuts to local authority funding. Secret backroom deals are not the answer. We urgently need a proper solution, which means providing councils with the funding they needed to solve this crisis.
Given the public interest in this matter we will be publishing this letter.
Labour Council Leaders