Home   News   Article

£145million off-road 'mass transit route' agreed to alleviate congestion on A1307 Haverhill to Cambridge route


By Josh Thomas, Local Democracy Reporter


Strategy 1 for the A1307. Map: GCP
Strategy 1 for the A1307. Map: GCP

Route expected to feature buses or tram-like vehicles and could eventually be extended to Haverhill

Cllr Lewis Herbert. Picture: Keith Heppell
Cllr Lewis Herbert. Picture: Keith Heppell

A new £145million off-road “mass transit route” has been approved as the best way to alleviate traffic on a busy commuter route into Cambridge.

The A1307 Haverhill to Cambridge route is one of the key commuter roads into Cambridge but it suffers from congestion during peak times, particularly at the Cambridge end, at the junction with the A11, and around Linton.

The Greater Cambridge Partnership’s executive board agreed on Thursday (October 11) to adopt “strategy one”, which includes an off-road “mass transit” route as the preferred strategy for the A1307 corridor.

Construction of the £145million route could be completed by spring 2024. The GCP says the project could benefit the region’s economy by up to £320million./

Lewis Herbert, chairman of the Greater Cambridge Partnership’s executive board, and leader of Cambridge City Council, said the route was much needed, and could even be extended as far as Haverhill to alleviate traffic on the busy route.

“I think it is an excellent proposal,” said Cllr Herbert.

“It is important it benefits villages as well as taking a lot of commuter traffic off the road, whether that is people going to Addenbrooke’s, or other places like the Granta Park.”

Cllr Herbert said there was a potential to change the route to accommodate light rail, but that a “tyred solution” (buses or tram-like vehicles) was the preferred option.

He said rail is more expensive and, should the route be extended through Linton to Haverhill, the overall cost could end up being a lot higher.

The route will join at the Cambridge end with the guided busway or a proposed city metro. It will call at a proposed new railway station at Addenbrooke’s Hospital before heading, via Great Shelford and Stapleford, to Sawston.

From there it will head to a Park & Ride terminus near the A505 which will serve people heading to the Babraham Research Campus and Granta Park.

As well as this, there is a potential extension to the route which connects Cambridge with Haverhill via Linton.

Cllr Herbert said there were “clear benefits” to the off-road route.

“It is important to take traffic off the road,” said Cllr Herbert. “The road, at the moment, doesn’t function. At peak times, we have traffic queuing over the Gog Magog hills.”

Cllr Aidan van de Weyer, deputy leader of South Cambridgeshire District Council, said the off-road route was to be welcomed, but needed to demonstrate clear benefits for the villages it passed through.

He said local people had to gain form the “enhancements” brought by the off-road route.

Tony Brown, who represents Haverhill at St Edmundsbury Borough Council, said the decision was “great news”.

He said improvements to the A1307 are “more than welcome and cannot come soon enough” to help people traveling between Haverhill and Cambridge.

Cllr Brown said: “I know that Haverhill residents will be over the moon, anything to improve safety and traffic flow on the A1307 is great news.”

GCP officers will now develop detailed proposals for the delivery of the scheme including detailed route alignment, a specific location for the Park & Ride, and a review of the potential environmental impact.

They will also draw up landscaping and ecological design proposals to add “enhancements” to the area, maximising the potential of the off-road option including considering the possibility of parkland alongside the development.

Read more

Mayor James Palmer calls for delivery of controversial Cambourne to Cambridge busway



COMMENTS
()


Iliffe Media does not moderate comments. Please click here for our house rules.

People who post abusive comments about other users or those featured in articles will be banned.

Thank you. Your comment has been received and will appear on the site shortly.

 

Terms of Comments

We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.

If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More