Greater Anglia to be renationalised next year as part of government overhaul

Greater Anglia will be one of the first rail companies to be renationalised by the Labour government, but the move is not expected to bring down train fares for passengers.

From next autumn Greater Anglia, which operates services in and out of Cambridge, will return to public ownership as part of a new law to improve the rail network.

South Western Railway’s train services will be the first transfer into public ownership from May next year, followed by c2c in July.

The transition of the three operators is part of Labour’s plans to bring contracts with existing rail operators into public ownership as they expire so taxpayers do not have to foot the bill to pay compensation to train firms.

Transport secretary Heidi Alexander said she expects the move to reduce cancellations and late trains on those lines, but rail fares are still expected to go up.

She said: “For too long, the British public has had to put up with rail services which simply don’t work. A complex system of private train operators has too often failed its users.

“Starting with journeys on South Western Railway, we’re switching tracks by bringing services back under public control to create a reliable rail network that puts customers first.

“Our broken railways are finally on the fast track to repair and rebuilding a system that the British public can trust and be proud of again.”

The government said the transition to a publicly-owned railway will improve reliability and support its number one priority of boosting economic growth by encouraging more people to use the railway.

Rail fares are due to rise by 4.6 per cent from March as set out in the Budget, a figure that the Transport Secretary repeated when asked if tickets will get cheaper with public ownership.

“The commercial realities of the railways are very challenging at the moment,” she told the BBC.

“Even under public ownership we’ve got to make sure that we’ve got enough money to provide the services that people want.

“Because otherwise you can enter into a little bit of a death spiral, really, if you start cutting services and people can’t get to where they want to get to when they want to get there – they’ll look for other options.”

The government said the change will save up to £150million a year in fees alone by ensuring money is spent on services rather than private shareholders.

Rail unions welcomed the move, with Aslef general secretary Mick Whelan saying the decision to privatise British Rail in 1994 was “foolish, ideologically-driven, and doomed to fail”.

He added: “The privateers have taken hundreds of millions of pounds from our railways and successive Conservative governments have pursued a policy of managed decline which has sold taxpayers, passengers, and staff short.”

Rail, Maritime and Transport union general secretary Mick Lynch said: “This is a significant step forward for passengers, rail workers, and those who want to see an efficient rail system run for the public good, rather than private profit.

“Bringing infrastructure and passenger services under one employer in public ownership means proper investment in operations, harmonising conditions for staff, and prioritising the needs of passengers.”

Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association general secretary Maryam Eslamdoust said: “The move will mean better value for taxpayers and better services for rail passengers. It recognises that railways should be run as a public service rather than as a cash cow for shareholders.

“We welcome the Labour government’s recognition of the expertise and experience that railway staff – our members – possess are crucial to the changes they want to see in the sector.”

But Gareth Bacon, the Conservative shadow transport secretary, said: “We are concerned that the government’s plans are simply an ideological undertaking that does not put passengers first.

“Keir Starmer’s latest transport secretary has a worrying record of failure when it comes to delivering projects on time that improve passenger services. We will closely monitor the impact of these plans.”

Rail Partners, an industry group of passenger train and freight firms, said: “Simply changing who runs the trains won’t deliver more reliable and affordable services for passengers, reduce subsidy for taxpayers, or grow rail freight.

“The key to both improving performance and holding down fares is restoring the railway to financial sustainability.

“It is counter-intuitive to start removing private sector operators from the system, with their track record of delivering growth to reduce subsidy, when the question of what will replace them long-term won’t be answered until further rail legislation is introduced.”