Home   News   Article

Question marks over 70 jobs as plans to move Porsche and Aston Martin showrooms to Duxford are rejected


By Ben Hatton, Local Democracy Reporter


There are question marks over 70 jobs at Porche and Aston Martin garages in South Cambridgeshire after franchise owner Lancaster failed to win planning approval to build new showrooms on a greenfield site in Duxford.

The launch of the Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo in Harston in October 2017
The launch of the Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo in Harston in October 2017

The owner of the existing dealerships in Harston High Street warned it risks losing its Porsche franchise if it cannot keep up with the brand’s dealership standards in what was described as a “competitive market”.

If the Porsche showroom were to close, the Aston Martin garage may not be able to stay open either, as the two share resources, the applicant’s agent Colin Brown said.

Lancaster wanted to move to a greenfield site off the A505 in Duxford, on the edge of Whittlesford Bridge.

The proposal was unanimously rejected by the South Cambridgeshire planning committee today (Wednesday June 12).

Mr Brown described the Harston site as too small, with no room for expansion.

He said it is “inefficient because there is inadequate space to park and store cars destined for the market. This means that they have to store cars off-site and make numerous round trips”.

He added: “In this case, Porsche, in particular, has indicated that they no longer wish to continue to supply cars if my clients cannot move to a more suitable site with an appropriate presence close to the existing dealership and fulfilling other requirements.”

Lancaster has been looking to move for four years, and the search for a new site has been “extensive”, he told the committee.

“The site subject to this planning application is the only realistic option that will enable them to remain operational in South Cambridgeshire, protecting some 70 jobs.”

He added: “We thought that the council might want to see this facility kept in the district and the jobs that are there retained in the district, so we saw that as quite an important consideration – clearly if you decide not to support this, other things will have to be considered.”

The application was recommended for refusal by a planning officer, who concluded: “The proposed development would be located outside of the village development framework and within the open countryside. The proposed site has not been allocated in the local plan, neighbourhood plan, nor is the scale of the development supported by other policies in the local plan.”

The officer said it “would encroach into the current open undeveloped countryside. The proposal would be excessively prominent in its location, resulting in the loss of open, rural countryside and cause harm to the visual amenity of the area”.

Cllr Henry Batchelor, the Liberal Democrat councillor for Linton, said: “I think we should give some weight to the fact that there are jobs in South Cambridgeshire at stake here. But on the flip side of that, I do not think in this particular case South Cambs should be giving up their planning policies for the business model of a luxury car company.

“Other than that though I think there are strong reasons for refusal – objections from a raft of statutory consultees, six parish councils in the area, and the case officer have recommended refusal”.

The group property manager for Lancaster, Michael Newton, did not comment on the decision as he left the committee room.


Read more

25-year-old man from Cambourne, Cambridgeshire wins two supercars worth £88,000, courtesy of BOTB (Best of the Best Plc)



COMMENTS
()


Iliffe Media does not moderate comments. Please click here for our house rules.

People who post abusive comments about other users or those featured in articles will be banned.

Thank you. Your comment has been received and will appear on the site shortly.

 

Terms of Comments

We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.

If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More